Peer-Reviewed Open Access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Home Issues Volume 1 · Issue 2 Article V1-I2-J-2026-0016
🔬 🔓 Open Access ✓ Peer-Reviewed Vol. 1 · Issue 2 · May 2026 · Pages

Idfc First Bank Government Account Fraud (2026): a Case Study on Banking Governance Failure, Insider Collusion, and Regulatory Gaps in India

IDFC FIRST BANK GOVERNMENT ACCOUNT FRAUD (2026): A CASE STUDY ON BANKING GOVERNANCE FAILURE, INSIDER COLLUSION, AND REGULATORY GAPS IN INDIA

TS
Tapas Kumar Sahoo✉️
Faculty of Management and Commerce, M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru
NB
Navajit Borah✉️
Faculty of Management and Commerce, M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru
369
Views
📄

Abstract

Abstract:

The fraud in IDFC First Bank's Chandigarh Branch that was estimated to be worth about ₹590 crores in 2026 is an excellent example of both internal control failures and gaps in regulatory oversight in the banking industry in India. A key area of focus in this case study will be how internal bank employee allegedly worked with external parties to steal public money. The fraud involved the use of secondary data from credible sources (Indian Express, Reuters, Economic Times, Official Disclosure) to examine the structure, method of operation, and outcome of the fraudulent activities. Specifically, the method of operation of the fraud included the use of forged documents, unauthorized transactions and fund transfers using shell companies to hide the true nature of the fraud. In addition to examining the institutional response to the fraud by evaluating bank level responses, regulatory responses and law enforcement agency investigations; the study also uses two theoretical models of fraud (Fraud Triangle and Agency Theory) to evaluate the motivations behind the fraud and weaknesses in the system. Finally, the study provides several recommendations for improving policies to ensure that there are no future instances of fraud. The case illustrates the continued risks associated with financial systems even after technological advancements have been made and points out that structural changes are needed to handle public monies in private banking.

🏷️

Keywords

📖

Full Article

🖼️

Figures & Tables

📚

References

Showing 0 of 0 references · APA 7 format
👥

Author Information

Authors and Affiliations

TS
Tapas Kumar Sahoo ORCIDCorresponding Author
Faculty of Management and Commerce, M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru
NB
Navajit Borah ORCIDCorresponding Author
Faculty of Management and Commerce, M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru

Contributions

⚖️

Ethics Declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Users can freely download, share, and reuse the article for any purpose (even commercially), as long as they give proper credit to the original author.

Competing Interests

Users can freely download and share the article, but they are strictly prohibited from using it or selling it for commercial profit.

Consent for Publication

Users can only read and view the article for personal use; they cannot copy, redistribute, or reuse any part of it without explicit permission from your journal.

📊

Post-Publication Impact

Live
Citations · Altmetric · Usage · Indexing · Score
🔬 18
Citations
42
Altmetric
👥 1,243
Downloads
84
Impact
📊
Citation Tracking citation
18 citations from 6 indexed databases · Field-normalized at 2.3× expected
15 Dec 2025
IMP-001
📚 Citation Sources
CrossRef 9
Google Scholar 6
Scopus 5
Web of Science 3
📈 Citation Growth
1
2024
7
2025
9
2026
📄 Cited By (showing 6 of 18)
Advances in Distributed Computing Systems for Manufacturing Industry 4.0
R. Patel et al. · IEEE Trans. on Systems (2026)
→ 10.1109/arjmd-2026-0102.cite.1
Machine Learning for Sustainable Development in Emerging Economies
S. Kim & J. Wang · Nature Sustainability (2026)
→ 10.1038/s41893-026-01284-7
Family Business Digital Transformation: A Multi-Country Comparison
M. Rodriguez et al. · Family Business Review (2026)
→ 10.1177/08944865-026-7891
Dynamic Capabilities and Resource Constraints: Evidence from BRICS
H. Watanabe · Strategic Management J. (2026)
→ 10.1002/smj.026.4521
SME Capability Trajectories in Latin American Manufacturing
C. Mendes et al. · J. of Int. Business Studies (2026)
→ 10.1057/s41267-026-00567
Industry 4.0 Adoption Barriers in MSMEs: A Systematic Review
A. Mehta & P. Joshi · Technovation (2026)
→ 10.1016/j.technovation.2026.102876
Integrity verified · Impact block #1 of 5 Auto-updated via CrossRef API
🛡️
Impact Chain Integrity Verified
All 5 blocks cryptographically linked · No tampering detected
Genesis: 6A70EF30
📋

Editorial Lifecycle

Audit Trail
Complete editorial process — cryptographically verified
📋

Editorial Process Audit Trail

Chain ID: NFSU-2026-V1-I2-J-2026-0016-CHAIN ✓ Verified · 6 blocks · Genesis 0x9f2b
Submitted Admin

Manuscript submitted via online portal

18 May 2026 15:20

BLK-001
Plagiarism Check Admin

iThenticate Plagiarism Check

18 May 2026 15:20

BLK-002
Initial Screening Admin

Screening Editors

18 May 2026 15:20

BLK-003
Accepted Admin

Editor decision: Accepted

18 May 2026 15:20

BLK-004
Ready for Production Admin

Manuscript Send to Production Manager!

18 May 2026 15:20

BLK-005
Published on the website Admin

Published on the website

18 May 2026 15:20

BLK-006
📅 Total editorial timeline: 6 blocks tracked Genesis Hash: 0x9f2b3c7d8e4a5f1b · Verified ✓
🔐

Verification & Trust

Compliant
COPE · ICMJE · FAIR · ORCID · CLOCKSS
🛡️

Article Integrity Verified

All editorial chain blocks cryptographically verified · Compliant with COPE, ICMJE, and FAIR standards

🔗 Chain Integrity
✓ 6 blocks verified
🌳 Genesis Hash (Merkle Root)
0x00000000f120e312ed049df78a88615d0d360c0d
📝 Plagiarism Screening
Not screened
🤖 AI Content Detection
Not screened
👥 Peer Reviewer Verification
1 verified reviewers (sealed)
🆔 ORCID Verification
0/2 authors verified
🔗 Crossref DOI Registration
Pending registration
📦 Preservation Archives
CLOCKSS ✓ Portico ✓
⚖️ Ethics Approval
💼 Conflict of Interest Declaration
🔐 Verification Standards: This article complies with COPE, ICMJE, FAIR data principles, iThenticate plagiarism screening, GPTZero AI content detection, and ORCID author identification. The audit trail is permanently preserved and independently verifiable.
ℹ️

About this article

📝 Cite this article · How to Cite

View all citation formats in sidebar →
📥 Received
18 May 2026
✏️ Revised
✅ Accepted
18 May 2026
📅 Published
18 May 2026
📄 Version of Record
18 May 2026
🔗 DOI
📖 Issue
Volume 1, Issue 2 (May 2026)
📃 Pages
(0 pages)
🔢 Article Number
NFSU-V1-I2-V1-I2-J-2026-0016
📜 License
CC BY-NC 4.0
🔗

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Provide free access to colleagues, peers, and your professional network — no subscription required for them to view the full article.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙