Red Flags in Upi (unified Payments Interface): a Study on Digital Payments in India
RED FLAGS IN UPI (UNIFIED PAYMENTS INTERFACE): A STUDY ON DIGITAL PAYMENTS IN INDIA
📄
Abstract
Abstract:
The advent of UPI in India to ease transactions and turn the economy to become almost a cent percent cashless, has seen a huge success ever since its inception about 9 years ago. Indians, on average. conduct about 50-100 transactions per head in a week (or 650M+ transactions in a day3), be it to buy a milk packet or pay their monthly insurance premiums. Along with this ease comes a lot of chances for fraudsters to develop new modus operandi to commit financial fraud. This paper aims to shed light on the red flags that exist within the UPI system in India which also poses as the primary objective of the research. The secondary objectives are to pinpoint and categorise the factors that contribute most significantly to fraud, to compare the traditional electronic payments systems with UPI in terms of security, and to establish user specific insights via primary data collection. The data collection methodology was ‘a questionnaire’ that heavily relied on studying user behaviour and patterns about digital payments as well as stakeholder mapping (of sample units including CAs, Academicians, Cybersecurity professionals & ordinary citizens). The findings of the research include (but are not limited to) citing reasons behind the majority of fraud, work out targeted recommendations to reduce the red flags (& occurrence of fraud) that go unnoticed in the UPI system and do a parallel study of the mobile payments guidelines of India, EU and USA. Future scope of the study may include in-depth studies that cover the technical vulnerabilities that nudge the user towards falling victim to fraud. However, it is out of scope for the current study to cover any other kind of sophisticated digital fraud
🏷️
Keywords
📖
Full Article
🖼️
Figures & Tables
📚
References
⚖️
Ethics Declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Users can freely download, share, and reuse the article for any purpose (even commercially), as long as they give proper credit to the original author.
Competing Interests
Users can freely download and share the article, but they are strictly prohibited from using it or selling it for commercial profit.
Consent for Publication
Users can only read and view the article for personal use; they cannot copy, redistribute, or reuse any part of it without explicit permission from your journal.
📊
Post-Publication Impact
LiveCitations · Altmetric · Usage · Indexing · Score
Post-Publication Impact
Live📋
Editorial Lifecycle
Audit TrailComplete editorial process — cryptographically verified
Editorial Lifecycle
Audit TrailEditorial Process Audit Trail
NFSU-2026-V1-I2-J-2026-0018-CHAIN
✓ Verified · 6 blocks · Genesis 0x9f2bManuscript submitted via online portal
18 May 2026 15:25
iThenticate Plagiarism Check
18 May 2026 15:25
Screening Editors
18 May 2026 15:25
Editor decision: Accepted
18 May 2026 15:25
Manuscript Send to Production Manager!
18 May 2026 15:25
Published on the website
18 May 2026 15:25
🔐
Verification & Trust
CompliantCOPE · ICMJE · FAIR · ORCID · CLOCKSS
Verification & Trust
CompliantArticle Integrity Verified
All editorial chain blocks cryptographically verified · Compliant with COPE, ICMJE, and FAIR standards