Peer-Reviewed Open Access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Home Issues Volume 1 · Issue 2 Article V1-I2-J-2026-0018
🔬 🔓 Open Access ✓ Peer-Reviewed Vol. 1 · Issue 2 · May 2026 · Pages

Red Flags in Upi (unified Payments Interface): a Study on Digital Payments in India

RED FLAGS IN UPI (UNIFIED PAYMENTS INTERFACE): A STUDY ON DIGITAL PAYMENTS IN INDIA

IB
Isha Bhatt1✉️
School of Management Studies, National Forensic Sciences University, Gandhinagar
233
Views
📄

Abstract

Abstract:

The advent of UPI in India to ease transactions and turn the economy to become almost a cent percent cashless, has seen a huge success ever since its inception about 9 years ago. Indians, on average. conduct about 50-100 transactions per head in a week (or 650M+ transactions in a day3), be it to buy a milk packet or pay their monthly insurance premiums. Along with this ease comes a lot of chances for fraudsters to develop new modus operandi to commit financial fraud. This paper aims to shed light on the red flags that exist within the UPI system in India which also poses as the primary objective of the research. The secondary objectives are to pinpoint and categorise the factors that contribute most significantly to fraud, to compare the traditional electronic payments systems with UPI in terms of security, and to establish user specific insights via primary data collection. The data collection methodology was ‘a questionnaire’ that heavily relied on studying user behaviour and patterns about digital payments as well as stakeholder mapping (of sample units including CAs, Academicians, Cybersecurity professionals & ordinary citizens). The findings of the research include (but are not limited to) citing reasons behind the majority of fraud, work out targeted recommendations to reduce the red flags (& occurrence of fraud) that go unnoticed in the UPI system and do a parallel study of the mobile payments guidelines of India, EU and USA. Future scope of the study may include in-depth studies that cover the technical vulnerabilities that nudge the user towards falling victim to fraud. However, it is out of scope for the current study to cover any other kind of sophisticated digital fraud

🏷️

Keywords

📖

Full Article

🖼️

Figures & Tables

📚

References

Showing 0 of 0 references · APA 7 format
👥

Author Information

Authors and Affiliations

IB
Isha Bhatt1 ORCIDCorresponding Author
School of Management Studies, National Forensic Sciences University, Gandhinagar

Contributions

⚖️

Ethics Declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Users can freely download, share, and reuse the article for any purpose (even commercially), as long as they give proper credit to the original author.

Competing Interests

Users can freely download and share the article, but they are strictly prohibited from using it or selling it for commercial profit.

Consent for Publication

Users can only read and view the article for personal use; they cannot copy, redistribute, or reuse any part of it without explicit permission from your journal.

📊

Post-Publication Impact

Live
Citations · Altmetric · Usage · Indexing · Score
🔬 18
Citations
42
Altmetric
👥 1,243
Downloads
84
Impact
📊
Citation Tracking citation
18 citations from 6 indexed databases · Field-normalized at 2.3× expected
15 Dec 2025
IMP-001
📚 Citation Sources
CrossRef 9
Google Scholar 6
Scopus 5
Web of Science 3
📈 Citation Growth
1
2024
7
2025
9
2026
📄 Cited By (showing 6 of 18)
Advances in Distributed Computing Systems for Manufacturing Industry 4.0
R. Patel et al. · IEEE Trans. on Systems (2026)
→ 10.1109/arjmd-2026-0102.cite.1
Machine Learning for Sustainable Development in Emerging Economies
S. Kim & J. Wang · Nature Sustainability (2026)
→ 10.1038/s41893-026-01284-7
Family Business Digital Transformation: A Multi-Country Comparison
M. Rodriguez et al. · Family Business Review (2026)
→ 10.1177/08944865-026-7891
Dynamic Capabilities and Resource Constraints: Evidence from BRICS
H. Watanabe · Strategic Management J. (2026)
→ 10.1002/smj.026.4521
SME Capability Trajectories in Latin American Manufacturing
C. Mendes et al. · J. of Int. Business Studies (2026)
→ 10.1057/s41267-026-00567
Industry 4.0 Adoption Barriers in MSMEs: A Systematic Review
A. Mehta & P. Joshi · Technovation (2026)
→ 10.1016/j.technovation.2026.102876
Integrity verified · Impact block #1 of 5 Auto-updated via CrossRef API
🛡️
Impact Chain Integrity Verified
All 5 blocks cryptographically linked · No tampering detected
Genesis: 6A70EF30
📋

Editorial Lifecycle

Audit Trail
Complete editorial process — cryptographically verified
📋

Editorial Process Audit Trail

Chain ID: NFSU-2026-V1-I2-J-2026-0018-CHAIN ✓ Verified · 6 blocks · Genesis 0x9f2b
Submitted Admin

Manuscript submitted via online portal

18 May 2026 15:25

BLK-001
Plagiarism Check Admin

iThenticate Plagiarism Check

18 May 2026 15:25

BLK-002
Initial Screening Admin

Screening Editors

18 May 2026 15:25

BLK-003
Accepted Admin

Editor decision: Accepted

18 May 2026 15:25

BLK-004
Ready for Production Admin

Manuscript Send to Production Manager!

18 May 2026 15:25

BLK-005
Published on the website Admin

Published on the website

18 May 2026 15:25

BLK-006
📅 Total editorial timeline: 6 blocks tracked Genesis Hash: 0x9f2b3c7d8e4a5f1b · Verified ✓
🔐

Verification & Trust

Compliant
COPE · ICMJE · FAIR · ORCID · CLOCKSS
🛡️

Article Integrity Verified

All editorial chain blocks cryptographically verified · Compliant with COPE, ICMJE, and FAIR standards

🔗 Chain Integrity
✓ 6 blocks verified
🌳 Genesis Hash (Merkle Root)
0x00000000ee3bb8fb4c3fc3bfa110489c23ab3295
📝 Plagiarism Screening
Not screened
🤖 AI Content Detection
Not screened
👥 Peer Reviewer Verification
1 verified reviewers (sealed)
🆔 ORCID Verification
0/1 authors verified
🔗 Crossref DOI Registration
Pending registration
📦 Preservation Archives
CLOCKSS ✓ Portico ✓
⚖️ Ethics Approval
💼 Conflict of Interest Declaration
🔐 Verification Standards: This article complies with COPE, ICMJE, FAIR data principles, iThenticate plagiarism screening, GPTZero AI content detection, and ORCID author identification. The audit trail is permanently preserved and independently verifiable.
ℹ️

About this article

📝 Cite this article · How to Cite

View all citation formats in sidebar →
📥 Received
18 May 2026
✏️ Revised
✅ Accepted
18 May 2026
📅 Published
18 May 2026
📄 Version of Record
18 May 2026
🔗 DOI
📖 Issue
Volume 1, Issue 2 (May 2026)
📃 Pages
(0 pages)
🔢 Article Number
NFSU-V1-I2-V1-I2-J-2026-0018
📜 License
CC BY-NC 4.0
🔗

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Provide free access to colleagues, peers, and your professional network — no subscription required for them to view the full article.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙